ARTICLE

ECONOMIC GROWTH FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND THE ENVIRONMENT AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION FOR SAARC COUNTRIES

01 Pages : 1-12

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gsssr.2016(I-I).01      10.31703/gsssr.2016(I-I).01      Published : Dec 2016

Economic Growth, Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: An Empirical Investigation for SAARC Countries

    The study tests the validity of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) for SAARC countries by using closed and open economy Models. The Peroni Panel Cointegration technique along with FMOLS estimation techniques have been used for empirical analysis by using the data from 1972-2015. The long run and short run estimates of the closed economy model reveals positive and significant relationship between Per capita GDP, per capita GDP2 and the carbon emissions that deny the existence of EKC. The findings of open economy model signify that FDI not only helps to transfer cleaner technologies, but it enables the producers to use less pollutant technologies for the production purposes. Moreover, an increase in the forest area is helpful for reducing the carbon emissions. Finally, population density and energy consumption are proved significant contributors of carbon emissions. The study suggests that effective policies should be followed for reducing emissions, regulating FDI-environment and per capita GDP environment relationship.

    Environment, Pollution, Carbon Emissions
    (1) Abida Yousaf
    Lecturer, Department of Economics, International Islamic University Islamabad, Pakistan.
    (2) Naila Erum
    PhD Scholar, Department of Public Policy, National Defence University Islamabad, Pakistan.
    (3) Fozia Bibi
    Assistant Professor, Department of IR, National Defence University Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Abidin, I. S. Z., Haseeb, M., Azam, M., & Islam, R. (2015). Foreign direct investment, financial Development, international trade and energy consumption: Panel data evidence from selected ASEAN Countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5(3), 841-850.
  • Adhikari, D., & Chen, Y. (2012). Energy consumption and economic growth: A panel cointegration analysis for developing countries. Review of Economics & Finance, 3(2), 68-80.
  • Agarwal, R. N. (2012). Economic Globalisation, Growth and the Environment: Testing of Environment Kuznet Curve Hypothesis for Malaysia. J Bus Fin Aff, 1(104), 2167-0234.
  • Ahmad, N. (2013). CO Emission, Population and Industrial Growth Linkages 2 in Selected South Asian Countries: A Co-Integration Analysis. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21(4), 615-622.
  • Al-Mulali, U., Saboori, B., & Ozturk, I. (2015). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Vietnam. Energy Policy, 76, 123-131.
  • Al-Mulali, U., Solarin, S. A., & Ozturk, I. (2015). Investigating the presence of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in Kenya: an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach. Natural Hazards, 1-19.
  • Apergis, N., & Ozturk, I. (2015). Testing Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecological Indicators, 52, 16-22.
  • Banerjee, P. K., & Rahman, M. Carbon Emissions and Environment: Evidences from Three Selected SAARC Countries.
  • Bhattarai, M., & Hammig, M. (2001). Institutions and the environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation: a crosscountry analysis for Latin America, Africa and Asia. World development, 29(6), 995-1010.
  • Bhattarai, M., & Hammig, M. (2004). Governance, economic policy, and the environmental Kuznets curve for natural tropical forests. Environment and Development Economics, 9(03), 367-382.
  • Cho, C. H., Chu, Y. P., & Yang, H. Y. (2014). An environment Kuznets Curve for GHG emissions: a panel cointegration analysis. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 9(2), 120-129.
  • Choumert, J., Motel, P. C., & Dakpo, H. K. (2013). Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve for deforestation a threatened theory? A meta-analysis of the literature. Ecological Economics, 90, 19-28.
  • Chowdhury, R. R., & Moran, E. F. (2012). Turning the curve: A critical review of Kuznets approaches. Applied Geography, 32(1), 3-11.
  • Chowdhury, R. R., & Moran, E. F. (2012). Turning the curve: A critical review of Kuznets approaches. Applied Geography, 32(1), 3-11.
  • Culas, R. J. (2007). Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve: An institutional perspective. Ecological Economics, 61(2), 429-437.
  • Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecological economics, 49(4), 431-455.
  • Elliott, R. J. R., Sun, P., & Chen, S. (2012). Growth, FDI and Energy intensity: Evidence form Chinese cities.
  • Elliott, R. J., Sun, P., & Chen, S. (2013). Energy intensity and foreign direct investment: A Chinese city-level study. Energy Economics, 40, 484-494.
  • Flint, A. (2003). Sustainable development-an impediment to environmentally sound growth in the South? The European Union and the least developed countries. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 4(2), 191-215.
  • Gervet, B. (2007). Deforestation Contributes to Global Warming.Renewable Energy Research Group,Division of Architecture and Infrastructure, LuleÃ¥ University of Technology SE- 97187 LuleÃ¥, Sweden.
  • Haisheng, Y., Jia, J., Yongzhang, Z., & Shugong, W. (2005). The impact on Environmental Kuznets Curve by trade and foreign direct investment in China. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 3(2), 14-19.
  • He, J., & Wang, H. (2012). Economic structure, development policy and environmental quality: An empirical analysis of environmental Kuznets curves with Chinese municipal data. Ecological Economics, 76, 49-59.
  • Hossain, S. (2014). Multivariate Granger causality between economic growth, electricity consumption, exports and remittance for the panel of three SAARC countries. European Scientific Journal, 8(1).
  • Islam, F., Shahbaz, M., & Rahman, M. M. (2013). Trade Openness, Financial Development Energy Use and Economic Growth in Australia: Evidence on Long Run Relation with Structural Breaks.
  • Jiang, Y. (2015). Foreign Direct Investment, Pollution, and the Environmental Quality: A Model with Empirical Evidence from the Chinese Regions. The International Trade Journal, (ahead- of-print), 1-16.
  • Lee, H. H., Chung, R. K., & Koo, C. M. (2005, March). On the relationship between economic growth and environmental sustainability. In Ministerial conference on environment and development in Asia and pacific (Vol. 26).
  • McDonald, R. I. (2006). Rates of environmental problem generation: Thoughts on a new research direction. Environmentalist, 26(4), 221-225.
  • Miah, M. D., Masum, M. F. H., Koike, M., Akther, S., & Muhammed, N. (2011). Environmental Kuznets Curve: the case of Bangladesh for waste emission and suspended particulate matter. The environmentalist, 31(1), 59-66.
  • Mukherjee, S., & Chakraborty, D. (Eds.). (2015). Environmental Challenges and Governance: Diverse Perspectives from Asia. Routledge.
  • Munasinghe, M. (1999). Is environmental degradation an inevitable consequence of economic growth: tunneling through the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological economics, 29(1), 89-109.
  • Munier, N. (2006). Economic growth and sustainable development: Could multicriteria analysis be used to solve this dichotomy? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 8(3), 425-443.
  • Pradhan, R. P. P. (2010). Energy consumption-growth nexus in saarc countries: Using cointegration and error correction model. Modern Applied Science, 4(4), p74.
  • Rahman, A. A., & Porna, A. K. (2014). Growth Environment Relationship: Evidence from Data on South Asia. Journal of Accounting, Finance and Economics, 4(1), 86-96.
  • Rudel, T. K., Coomes, O. T., Moran, E., Achard, F., Angelsen, A., Xu, J., & Lambin, E. (2005). Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change. Global environmental change, 15(1), 23-31.
  • Shahbaz, M., & Dube, S. (2012). Revisiting the relationship between coal consumption and economic growth: cointegration and causality analysis in Pakistan. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 12(1), 1-13.
  • Shahbaz, M., Khan, S., & Tahir, M. I. (2013). The dynamic links between energy consumption, economic growth, financial development and trade in China: fresh evidence from multivariate framework analysis. Energy Economics, 40, 8-21.
  • Shahbaz, M., Nasreen, S., Abbas, F., & Anis, O. (2015). Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in high-, middle-, and low-income countries? Energy Economics, 51, 275-287.
  • Shahbaz, M., Solarin, S. A., Sbia, R., & Bibi, S. (2015). Does energy intensity contribute to CO 2 emissions? A trivariate analysis in selected African countries. Ecological indicators, 50, 215-224.
  • Stern, D. I. (2014). The environmental Kuznets curve: A primer. Centre for Climate Economics & Policy, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
  • Stern, David I.
  • Uddin, M. M. (2014). Carbon Emission and Economic Growth of SAARC Countries: A Vector Autoregressive (VAR) Analysis. Global Journal of Human-Social Science Research, 14(3).
  • Unpublished M-Phill thesis,
  • Van, P. N., & Azomahou, T. (2007). Nonlinearities and heterogeneity in environmental quality: An empirical analysis of deforestation. Journal of Development Economics, 84(1), 291-309.
  • Vinodan, C. (2010). Energy, environment and security in South Asia. A Biannual Journal of South Asian Studies, 1.
  • Wang, K. M. (2013). The relationship between carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: quantile panel-type analysis. Quality & Quantity, 47(3), 1337-1366
  • Webber, D. J., & Allen, D. O. (2010). Environmental Kuznets curves: mess or meaning? International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 17(3), 198-207.
  • Winslow, M. (2005, January). The environmental Kuznets curve revisited once again. In Forum for Social Economics (Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 1-18). Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Yandle, B., Bhattarai, M., & Vijayaraghavan, M. (2004). Environmental Kuznets curves: a review of findings, methods, and policy implications. Research study, 2, 1-1
  • Zeshan, M., & Ahmed, V. (2013). Energy, environment and growth nexus in South Asia. Environment, development and sustainability, 15(6), 1465-1475.

Cite this article

    APA : Yousaf, A., Erum, N., & Bibi, F. (2016). Economic Growth, Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: An Empirical Investigation for SAARC Countries. Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, I(I), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsssr.2016(I-I).01
    CHICAGO : Yousaf, Abida, Naila Erum, and Fozia Bibi. 2016. "Economic Growth, Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: An Empirical Investigation for SAARC Countries." Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, I (I): 1-12 doi: 10.31703/gsssr.2016(I-I).01
    HARVARD : YOUSAF, A., ERUM, N. & BIBI, F. 2016. Economic Growth, Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: An Empirical Investigation for SAARC Countries. Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, I, 1-12.
    MHRA : Yousaf, Abida, Naila Erum, and Fozia Bibi. 2016. "Economic Growth, Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: An Empirical Investigation for SAARC Countries." Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, I: 1-12
    MLA : Yousaf, Abida, Naila Erum, and Fozia Bibi. "Economic Growth, Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: An Empirical Investigation for SAARC Countries." Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, I.I (2016): 1-12 Print.
    OXFORD : Yousaf, Abida, Erum, Naila, and Bibi, Fozia (2016), "Economic Growth, Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: An Empirical Investigation for SAARC Countries", Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, I (I), 1-12
    TURABIAN : Yousaf, Abida, Naila Erum, and Fozia Bibi. "Economic Growth, Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: An Empirical Investigation for SAARC Countries." Global Strategic & Security Studies Review I, no. I (2016): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsssr.2016(I-I).01