Abstract
Our globalized security and strategy are prone to multifaceted encounters moving its constancy. Rapid addition, technical progression, and general communal growth need party-political constancy. Thus, state aids in the direction of global security are vital and comfortable. China’s aids to US intermediation assignments have long-drawn-out radically during the last period, particularly the African.China wants to make available the worldwide public with a new global building, with the final goal of maintainable peace and growth via an active appointment in mediation projects. This object will amount China’s assembly in United Mediation assignments and, based on latest information, find out why most of its mediation personnel are focused on the African soil. The research will also measure the tests and subjects confronted by Chinese workers both on African soil and the global arena. The article concludes China’s increasing role in international security and strategy concerns with insinuations on China-African relatives.
Key Words
Security, Strategy Peace keeping, China, United Nations, Missions, Africa
Introduction
Over an age, China has reliably upheld an earmarked rank as part of the country’s distant policy. China upheld non-interfering and non-intervention policies in respect to the sovereignty of other countries (Guo and Guo 2010, 162). Unlike the United States, China revealed little interest in the internal businesses of other motherlands, despite having the monetary and financial strengths to inspiration distant businesses (Starr 2010, 12-88). However, over the last few years, China’s role in International businesses is cumulative in the light of unstable states get up in some countries that might creep up Chinese inhabitants and savings (Cable and Ferdinand 1994, 243-261). In reply, China recognized a peacekeeping unit with over 8000 troops as compared to 2600 in 2016 (Abegunrin and Manyeruke 2019, 177). More, the country documented a $1 billion Concord and Growth fund to provision mediation assignments.
According to Dr. Edgar Agubamah, mediation assignments entail placement of military forces to sustain peace or to enforce truces among hostile groups or among political factions in a country (Agubamah 2014, 193-197). According to the 2015 United Nations Peacekeeping bang, intermediation using carrying weapons force has assisted war-torn states to create circumstances favorable for long enduring concord. The United Nations match up global dealings hard work, above all in unbalanced states in Europe, Africa, South America, and Asia. Peacekeeping has proven to be an effective tool since it is regarded as by legality, exceptional robust point, worldwide collaboration, encumbrance distribution and the aptitude to carry out multidimensional orders (Ling 2014, 75). Therefore, it is commanding that intercession coursework stick to the next three values. First, they obligation have agreement of the conferences; next, they must bodybuilding neutrality; and third, they must not use keenness except in protection instinct or when self-protective their mandates (Agubamah 2014, 193-197). The next division relates the history of Chinese participation in peacekeeping missions from place to place the world. It places of attention the case in point shift from non-interference and non-interference strategies to the current worldwide inspiration on peacetime and human rights norms.
Contextual Background
As above-mentioned, China hardly ever interfered to calm the politically aware tempests of other nation state. Rendering to Ling, China strongly believes in the principle of non-interference (Ling 2014, 77). This is the most important reason as to why it had shied away from UN international relations assignments until the 1990s. However, the example altered when Chinese inaugural and reform procedures progressively set in its political and financial interests within the worldwide system. As a result, it’s political outreach also lengthy and became worldwide. Before the reforms, China apparent worldwide intermediation assignments as efforts to weaken national sovereignty (Ling 2014, 78). The reasons for the example shift from non-interference and non-intervention to intermediation will be deliberated in later segments.
The first group of Chinese mediators was posted in 1990 to video display unit and report on ceasefire contract defilements in the Middle East. They work for in the United Nations Truce Management Group as military eye witness (UNTSO).In the following three years, an 800-strong Chinese construction brigade was sent to Cambodia to rebuild injured main road and airports (Starr 2010, 12-88). According to CSIS, China is set to be the second-largest funder of international relative’s funds after the United States (CSIS 2017). As such, China’s share will rise from the current 6.6% to 10.3%, thereby go beyond Japan. As well, China has donated over 3000 troops to over 10 global battle zones, mostly in Africa (CSIS 2017). The UN stated that the state has developed the second-largest cheap in the world and therefore should donate more; in answer, China sends a wide range of specialists to conflict zones including bring about, juggernauts and medicinal corps who are highly proficient and well-equipped.
Additionally, the country has a devoted arbitration personnel training academy, and the UN is seeking further mutual aid with China in this regard. As well this, China sends all-inclusive international relations teams including of various specialists to provide support in almost all state of affairs. According to The Telegraph, the United States has around 70 international relations teams around the world (Kirk 2015). The country holds back from distribution more crowds around all God's creatures after 18 American intermediation soldiers were slaughtered in Somalia in 1993. Therefore, since China is the maximum sponsor of crowds in the group of five countries with veto power, it will be highly influential in international affairs. The need and position of international relations assignments will be deliberated in the next section. Pinaud15 states that intercontinental international relations are a critical arm of Chinese public mediation as it is envisioned to scheme an image of accountable global power (Pinaud 2014, 192–211).
The Need for Peacekeeping: A Security and Strategy Concerns
The United Nations (UN) defines mediation as a way of conveying composed countries that were torn apart by conflict, thus creating conditions for maintainable peace. According to Chris Alden, international relations actions aim to create nonviolent and stable relations through fighting and civil means (Alden 2014, 1-9). Many republics in the world are confronted with party-political unpredictability, and in dangerous cases civil rebellions appear. Such circumstances create volatile circumstances for peace and strain their countries’ police and soldierly capitals. For this reason, normal pecuniary and social progressions of existence are halted and this results in philanthropic crises ( Lam 2015, 917–918). For example, in South Sudan and Syria, battles have completely demolished their frugalities, and private citizens have no means of existence except aid (M. and Hunt 2014, 23). In such conditions, the UN delays by sending mediation troops donated by willing countries ( Lam 2015, 917–918). Again, the UN founds a mandate that guides the peacekeeping missions. They help by addressing humanitarian crises and preventing additional loss of lives. Having only if the basis for intermediation assignments, the theory and repetition of pacification will be deliberated in the next section. As such, it is significant to comprehend the code of belief that underpin intermediation missions.
China, being among the leading world powers, is exceedingly committed to ensuring peace not only in Africa but in the world as a whole. China’s mediation assignments have been mostly focused in Africa, as the landmass is pretentious mostly by sanctuary subjects such as party-political unpredictability and tribal wars (Van Wyk 2015, 180-198). As a member of United Nations peacekeeping missions, the Chinese administration currently make available police, military specialists, and troops in order to ensure peace and steadiness on the continent. While Chinese soldiers patrol the streets of conflict zones, the medical corps are usually on ground, offering free medical facilities to victims of war as part of speaking charitable crises. Similarly, Chinese bring about are usually positioned to rebuild injured critical setting up such as connections, roads and landing field, letting the recommencement of standard order (Ouyang 2017). In September 2014, China broadcasted the distribution of a battalion of 700 troops to reinforce the United Nations peacekeeping mission in South Sudan (M. and Hunt 2014, 23). Therefore, China’s troop involvement has almost tripled when compared to the previous year, representative China’s dedication in the direction of peace structure in Africa.
Theory vs Practice in Peacekeeping
As per Bidwell, intermediation is overvalued because the repetition be different from the theory (Bidwell 2005, 635-639). In fact, he states that intermediation is both a determined account and the major reason why most assignments have ended in utter disappointment or lengthy stays. The problem-solving philosophies of arbitration suggest that mediation missions lack the armed aptitude and the specialist to keep peace (Bidwell 2005, 635-639). As such, they focus on mediation as the most suitable and impartial response to battles. Their main resolution is to restore peace. For this reason, they provide an impartial, objective and soothing activity, while underweight from their sponsors (Findlay 1996, 15). Bidwell traces the building blocks of peace intervention and international relatives as get up from crisis administration organizations created in Europe in the 19th century.
They were technologically progressive to contribution in dealing with conflicts developing in interwar periods, during defeats and settlement. The first mediation assignment under the sponsorships of the UN was called “UNEF in Sinai”. Its creation philosophies were defenseless arbitration, intensive care, agreement, non-use of power and neutrality. From a practical being vantage point, international family memberships are not intended to language crises or working plans. As a substitute, much importance is placed on international thoughts, power distribution and accretion prosperity amongst the elites, and foreign policy issues (Herrington 2011). However, problem-solving philosophies have some demerits, which are; instrumentalism, objectivism, and non-reflexive methodologies.
In instrumentalism, the role of governments in mediation assignments is passed over. On the other hand, in objectivism interveners define their own programs as an alternative to inclosing a communal approach28. In non-reflexive line of attack, interveners ignore the unfairness and expectations of philosophies, which information to unlock for consequences. According to Dr. Edgar Agubamah (Agubamah 2014, 193-197), worldwide international family membership’s assignments are stressed with many teething dilemmas, fluctuating from doctrinal misunderstanding to absence of clarity concerning the appropriate use of force and the claim of trustworthiness, independence and consent (Bidwell 2005, 635-639). Minutiae of some of the contests facing Chinese intermediation troops will be deliberated in the next section, as life illustrative of other intermediating assignments.
China’s Character and Challenges to Peace keepers in Africa
Mediators are typically confronted with many intimidations and some of them end up paying the eventual price. Rendering to Kuo and Yinyin (Kuo and Yinyin 2016), Best china first sent troops to Sudan in 2006, amid a civil war in the southern parts of the country. In 2011, the Sudanese administration rolled out a plebiscite and the South chose to secede from the rest of the country. The result was hailed all over the world but not enough measures were put in place in order to form a stable and able government (Asongu and Aminkeng 2016). An unsuccessful coup throws yourself the country in interminable chaos, and the UN get involved after the state of affairs get worse. As in other cases, Fine china sent about 700 troops to South Sudan, since of its profitable and political welfares in the country. In fact, China has a 40% stake in the state-owned National Petroleum Company of South Sudan (Kuo and Yinyin 2016). However, citizen reactions recommend that the state should once more approve its prior stance of non-interference, and remove all its multitudes from overseas countries (Bayan 2014). Since there is no other way by which to pledge the defense of Chinese troops while in universal warfronts, it is sensible to propose that Chinese countries are against the placement of mediation troops in other countries.
Chinese involvement in intermediation procedures in Africa is a clear suggestion of the datum that it is pro tem as an accountable superpower (Findlay 1996, 15). China has come to the understanding that chipping in in international relations procedures not only in Africa, but in the all God's beings as a whole can help ease draining in parts exaggerated by conflicts (Gambari 2013). In Africa, China uses the Westphalia international relations line of attack. A good case in point of this is South Sudan, where China is South Sudan’s external argument significant other and the former buys 82% of the latter’s oil export while at the same time providing the African country with infrastructural developments. Although most of Chinese mediation assignments are non-combative, in both Mali (in 2013) and South Sudan (in 2011), Chinese crowds with full defensive gear have been spotted (Li 2013, 73-90).
Chinese crowds face numerous trials in their mediation missions in Africa, such as linguistic fences and disapproving weather circumstances particularly in the northern part of Africa which contains mostly of the Sahara Desert (Zounmenou 2008, 72-74), (Zounmenou 2008, 75-81). These tests are not sole to the military crowds but affect both Chinese and other foreign troops. However, due to deployment of defense units, Chinese troops are required to deal with highly risky and failing security environments and face everyday attacks from revolutionary unorthodox assemblies in most African countries. A circumstance was cited previous where a Chinese group of mediators was fire at, resulting in the deaths of two soldiers, with six others at the bottom of serious wounds. The Chinese workers and armed staff experience two distinct pathways of working out for mediation processes. Applicants that have a least of one-year knowledge in mediation assignments in the field may be not compulsory for posts in the UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) (Yamashita 2012, 165-186). All through this old-fashioned, the unit memberships are given instructions on the present safekeeping state of affairs in the pretentious country, national compassions, rules of appointment, and the logistical support organization in place ( Dharmapuri 2012, 241-272).
China in African Security: Intervention vs Interference
In recent years, the Chinese management is more and more getting involved in joint mediation interactions and working out when it comes to military-related happenings. This has, as a result, led to two-pronged and provincial security-related dialogues (Tanner and Mackenzie 2015, 155). China makes obtainable at least a small one hundreds of military help to nation state with which it has political family members. As a substance of fact, this is the main reason for wide-ranging discussions in China on the essential to recall crowds from states where China has no planned benefits. In specific, China has fake strong armed relations with Ghana, Egypt, Angola, Algeria, South Africa, Tanzania, Sudan, Zambia, Zimbabwe and Uganda. It is so significant to note that martial provision is only if not only to republics with pertinent inorganic capitals. China also provides monetary help by way of aid and scholarships; and also make available Chinese armed forces with help and training agendas. For example, in 2007, China instigated a de-mining help program in Eritrea, Ethiopia, Chad, Sudan and other African states, with the goals of employees training (IISS 2020, 444-514). Military to military collaboration amid China and Africa is significant in transporting about and upholding harmony and safe keeping in the often war-affected African landmass.
Reshaping International Security and Strategy Concerns
China has liked practical financial growth in the past years, and this amassed development, joined with augmented military strong point, could be seen as a danger to other conditions. China’s exceptional system of ascendency is not unescapably supposed deprived of scruple in a capitalistic and self-governing subject world. By being conventional complex in upholding universal peace and safety, Beijing hopes to redesign its global image and be seen as a nonviolent and accountable investor on the global scene (Garlick 2016). This will go a long way in the direction of safeguarding Beijing’s national and intercontinental lawfulness. Chinese state media have proclaimed China’s influence on United Nations peacekeeping mission in South Sudan as proof of the country’s new role as an in charge, worldwide stakeholder (Fung 2016, 1-5).
Trade and industry Interests
To reflect China’s initiate to provide security and constancy in Africa as an unselfish gesticulation is not completely accurate. Between the years 2000 to 2015, China’s trade with Africa has grown from $6 billion to $107 billion (ICG 2009, 1-43). Africa has become a lush ground for Chinese speculation, and China carries on investing more in Africa. To ensure this expansion in trade value, however, China supplies an even and secure atmosphere. South Sudan saw the first placement of a Chinese throng in a United Nations Peacekeeping Processes. China has 1,068 contingent troops in South Sudan, under the knowledge of the United Nations. When the United Nations Mission in South Sudan began in 2011, China only donated about 350 workers, reaching from causes to medicinal staff. However, in September 2014, China proclaimed that it would add an additional 700 military employees to the United Nations mediation mission in South Sudan.
China’s potential to creating faithfulness in South Sudan is related to its savings, and to providing a safe situation for Chinese civilians working there. Uniting this information with the aforementioned memorandum of sympathetic for renovating the railway line linking Dakar to Bamako, as well as the building of a railway line concerning Bamako to Conakry, shows how imperative Mali is to China’s grand scheme of reserves in Africa. Perchance Bamako will serve as a domestic hub, connecting blocked-in cities in West Africa to numerous ports in their close nearness. These arrangements, counting the attendance of 3000 Chinese citizens in Mali, are incentive enough for China to sign up for the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Steadying Assignment in Mali. The PLA absences first-hand knowledge and data in the rest of the world. By cumulative Chinese military participation in UN peacekeeping processes in Africa, the PLA has the chance to gather data from the landmass as well as subject its troops to new land and harsh weather conditions ( Lam 2015, 917–918). The knowledge and knowledge congregated by these PLA memberships will be applied in the working out governments of other members of the PLA.
Challenges: National Interest vs International Principles
While China’s policy on UN intermediation processes has changed over the years, China has stuck to two core philosophies, one of which is respect for state sovereignty ( Lam 2015, 917–918). However, in 2008, China pushed Darfur into tolerant the presence of UN peacekeeping forces. This pressure perchance only occurred because China is well invested in Sudanese oil fields and couldn’t have enough money to have oil manufacture damagingly impacted (Ling 2014, 76). It was also the same year China held the Olympic Games, thus it could not afford to add the Sudanese subjects to the list of disapprovals leveled contrary to it, one of which was the Tibetan issue. Also, in 2012, China did not withdraw or veto the UN permissions commanding South Sudan to stop the mass slaughters. As China’s nationwide and financial interest upsurges in Africa, it will be torn between shielding its national attention and with regard to the dominion of other states, thereby abstention from intrusive in the national matters of African states.
Linguistic Obstructions
According to Wu and Taylor, China’s promise to United States Mediation efforts is not a horizontal ride for the Chinese troops complicated in the assignments (Zhengyu and Taylor 2011, 137-154). Most of their Chinese complements speak English and French, and the nations in which these assignments take place are French or English language countries. The Chinese crowds thus have the test of interactive both with those they work with, and with those they hope to defend. Chinese crowds– combat, non-combat, and civilian personnel – “tend to keep to themselves and do not cooperate much with other intermediation committees or with local inhabitants” due to their lack of skill in English or French, the chief tongues used in UN peace missions (XIA 2014).
Facing Communal Views
In this age of explanation, it is very problematic for governments to arc the dirt under the fitted carpet. Unlike the United States of America, the United Kingdom, and Russia, which provide monetary capitals to other collections that help in concord structure and peacekeeping62, China donates cash and is also the major funder with troops in the five-member UNSC with veto power. According to Godement (Godemen 2016), “Chinese ‘public opinion’ is the only often cited ballast to Xi’s policy choices”. While China aims to exchange its image as an accountable power, it has come under some disapproval from the citizens. Authorities fear Chinese public opinion would only accept intrusions by China if the reason is overtly based on China’s instantaneous comforts, as divergent to any idea of causative to universal governance (Ibid). This year alone, about 20 Chinese mediators have been killed in worldwide warfronts, while the other four republics have agonized unimportant fatalities. More often than not, the UK and US have been known to send private army to deal with possible threats to security (Berhe and Hongwu 2013).
Many Chinese countries have also recommended such activities in order to decrease mass fatalities wreaked upon their troops. The Chinese are also apprehensive that their Good will pull their country into trans-regionals and trans-nationals battles, which may not be good for their worldwide viewpoint. As well, the Chinese also disapprove of their administration for the placement of troops to republics with no planned attention, such as Kosovo and other small republics in Northern Europe. They propose that the administration should fund other system of government for such missions. Campaigners and specialists have been calling for politicians to put in more events in instruction to improve the intermediaries’ aptitudes to cope with frequent intimidations in their areas of disposition.
Conclusion
In assumption, China’s mediation missions in Africa are tied to planned interests and improvement of global image. However, the Chinese management has come under heavy condemnation from the country’s inhabitants and some opinion leaders, because it has failed to take stern actions to comprise mass killings of Chinese troops. The killing of two UN armed forces in an immigrant camp in South Sudan in July 2016 infuriated many citizens, because the administration put on the same bombast of powerfully reproachful such actions. As such, most Chinese are of the estimation that the republic should follow the trend set by the United States, the United Kingdom, France and Russia. These republics typically send secluded armed forces to remove the strongest threats and enforce peace. Additionally, they also fund groups and administrations that play dangerous roles in direction-finding towards the accomplishment of peace. As China endures to upsurge its incidence in Africa through massive reserves, it will remain a contest as well as a quandary to maintain peace and keep the belief of non-interference.
References
- Dharmapuri, S. (2012).
- Lam, W, W,-L,.
- Abegunrin, O,. Charity, M. (2019). China's Power in Africa: A New Global Order. London: Springer Nature.
- Edgar, A. (2014). China and Peacekeeping in Africa. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(11), 193-197.
- Alden, C. (2014). Seeking security in Africa: China's evolving approach to the African Peace and Security Architecture. Norway: The Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre.
- Asongu, S. A., and G. Aminkeng.
- Bayan. (March 15, 2014). Non-interference on the line. http://www.economist.com/ne/china/21599035-crisis-ukraine-uncovers-hole-hearted- chinese-fowsreign-policy-non-interfernce.
- Berhe, Gebrehiwot, M., & Hongwu, L. (2013). China-Africa Relations: Governance, Peace and Security. Addis Ababa: Institute for Peace and Security Studies, Addis Ababa.
- Bidwell, S. (2005).
- Cable, Vincent, & Ferdinand, P. (1994).
- CSIS. China Power. March 15, 2017. (accessed April 30, 2020). https://chinapower.csis.org/china-un-mission/
- Findlay, T. Challenges for New Peacekeepers. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 1996.
- Fung, Courtney J. (2016) . China's Troop Contributions to UN Peacekeeping. RESEARCH REPORT , Washington, D.C., United States: US Institute of Peace, 1-5.
- Gambari, I. (2013).Beyond its Mineral/Natural resources: Why Afica Matters to the World. Singapore: RSIS,
- Garlick, Jeremy . (September 26, 2016). China is taking a leading role in solving the refugee crisis. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2016-09/26/content_26900418.htm.
- François, G. (March 6, 2016).Will China Cooperate with the West in Resolving Global Crises. https://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_will_china_cooperate_with_the_west_in_res olving_global_crises.
- Guo, Sujian, & Guo, B. (2010). Greater China in an Era of Globalization. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Herrington, L. M. (Jully 15, 2011). Why the Rise of China will not Lead to Global Hegmony. E- International Relations Students: www.e-ir.info/2011/07/15/Why-the-Rise-of-China-will- not-Lead-to-Global-Hegmony-2011-07-1.
- ICG. (2009) China's Growing Role in UN Peacekeeping. Brussels, Belgium: International Crisis Group, 1-43.
- IISS. (February 13, 2020). Chapter Nine: Sub-Saharan Africa. International Institute for Strategic Studies. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/04597222.2020.1707971.
- Ashley, K. (September 29 , 2015). UN peacekeepers: How many personnel does each country contribute? The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/11898603/UN-peacekeepers- How-many-personnel-does-each-country-contribute.html.
- Kuo, L., & E. Yinyin. (July 11, 2016).China Reacts to the Death of Two Peacekeepers in South Sudan with Grief and Rage. http://qz.com/728566/China-Reacts-to-the-Death-of-Two- Peacekeepers-in-South-Sudan- with-Grief-and-Rage-2106.
- Li, C. P. (2013).
- Ling, B. China's Peacekeeping Diplomacy. Malan: M. & Hunt, 2014.
- Malan, M., & Hunt, C, T. (2014). Between the Rock and Hard Place. Institute of Security Studies.
- Ouyang. (March 1, 2017). Chinese peacekeeping force completes Blue Helmet Mission in Liberia. chinamilitary: http://english.chinamil.com.cn/view/2017- 03/01/cointent_7509637.htm.2017.03.01.
- Clemence, P. (2014).
- Bryan, S. J. (2010). Understanding China: A Guide to China's Economy, History, and Political Culture. New York, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
- Tanner, M. S., & Mackenzie, P,. W. (2015).China's Emerging National Security Interests and Their Impact on the People's Liberation Army. Washington : Marine Corps History Division.
- Wyk, V., & Ansie, J. (2015).
- XIA, M. (March 12, 2014). https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/ref/college/coll-china-politics-007.html.
- Xiaolin, M. (June 25, 2016). The Human Cost of Peacekeeping. .june.23.2016. http://bjreview.com/opinion/201606/t20160614-800059353.html
- Hikaru, Y. (2012).
- Wu , and Taylor, I. (2011).
- David, Z. (2008).
- Dharmapuri, S. (2012).
- Lam, W, W,-L,.
- Abegunrin, O,. Charity, M. (2019). China's Power in Africa: A New Global Order. London: Springer Nature.
- Edgar, A. (2014). China and Peacekeeping in Africa. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(11), 193-197.
- Alden, C. (2014). Seeking security in Africa: China's evolving approach to the African Peace and Security Architecture. Norway: The Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre.
- Asongu, S. A., and G. Aminkeng.
- Bayan. (March 15, 2014). Non-interference on the line. http://www.economist.com/ne/china/21599035-crisis-ukraine-uncovers-hole-hearted- chinese-fowsreign-policy-non-interfernce.
- Berhe, Gebrehiwot, M., & Hongwu, L. (2013). China-Africa Relations: Governance, Peace and Security. Addis Ababa: Institute for Peace and Security Studies, Addis Ababa.
- Bidwell, S. (2005).
- Cable, Vincent, & Ferdinand, P. (1994).
- CSIS. China Power. March 15, 2017. (accessed April 30, 2020). https://chinapower.csis.org/china-un-mission/
- Findlay, T. Challenges for New Peacekeepers. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 1996.
- Fung, Courtney J. (2016) . China's Troop Contributions to UN Peacekeeping. RESEARCH REPORT , Washington, D.C., United States: US Institute of Peace, 1-5.
- Gambari, I. (2013).Beyond its Mineral/Natural resources: Why Afica Matters to the World. Singapore: RSIS,
- Garlick, Jeremy . (September 26, 2016). China is taking a leading role in solving the refugee crisis. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2016-09/26/content_26900418.htm.
- François, G. (March 6, 2016).Will China Cooperate with the West in Resolving Global Crises. https://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_will_china_cooperate_with_the_west_in_res olving_global_crises.
- Guo, Sujian, & Guo, B. (2010). Greater China in an Era of Globalization. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Herrington, L. M. (Jully 15, 2011). Why the Rise of China will not Lead to Global Hegmony. E- International Relations Students: www.e-ir.info/2011/07/15/Why-the-Rise-of-China-will- not-Lead-to-Global-Hegmony-2011-07-1.
- ICG. (2009) China's Growing Role in UN Peacekeeping. Brussels, Belgium: International Crisis Group, 1-43.
- IISS. (February 13, 2020). Chapter Nine: Sub-Saharan Africa. International Institute for Strategic Studies. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/04597222.2020.1707971.
- Ashley, K. (September 29 , 2015). UN peacekeepers: How many personnel does each country contribute? The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/11898603/UN-peacekeepers- How-many-personnel-does-each-country-contribute.html.
- Kuo, L., & E. Yinyin. (July 11, 2016).China Reacts to the Death of Two Peacekeepers in South Sudan with Grief and Rage. http://qz.com/728566/China-Reacts-to-the-Death-of-Two- Peacekeepers-in-South-Sudan- with-Grief-and-Rage-2106.
- Li, C. P. (2013).
- Ling, B. China's Peacekeeping Diplomacy. Malan: M. & Hunt, 2014.
- Malan, M., & Hunt, C, T. (2014). Between the Rock and Hard Place. Institute of Security Studies.
- Ouyang. (March 1, 2017). Chinese peacekeeping force completes Blue Helmet Mission in Liberia. chinamilitary: http://english.chinamil.com.cn/view/2017- 03/01/cointent_7509637.htm.2017.03.01.
- Clemence, P. (2014).
- Bryan, S. J. (2010). Understanding China: A Guide to China's Economy, History, and Political Culture. New York, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
- Tanner, M. S., & Mackenzie, P,. W. (2015).China's Emerging National Security Interests and Their Impact on the People's Liberation Army. Washington : Marine Corps History Division.
- Wyk, V., & Ansie, J. (2015).
- XIA, M. (March 12, 2014). https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/ref/college/coll-china-politics-007.html.
- Xiaolin, M. (June 25, 2016). The Human Cost of Peacekeeping. .june.23.2016. http://bjreview.com/opinion/201606/t20160614-800059353.html
- Hikaru, Y. (2012).
- Wu , and Taylor, I. (2011).
- David, Z. (2008).
Cite this article
-
APA : Khan, A. M., Rahim, N., & Muzaffar, M. M. (2020). China's Character in Peacekeeping in Africa: A Security and Strategic Concerns. Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, V(II), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsssr.2020(V-II).02
-
CHICAGO : Khan, Assad Mehmood, Nazim Rahim, and Mian Muhammad Muzaffar. 2020. "China's Character in Peacekeeping in Africa: A Security and Strategic Concerns." Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, V (II): 12-20 doi: 10.31703/gsssr.2020(V-II).02
-
HARVARD : KHAN, A. M., RAHIM, N. & MUZAFFAR, M. M. 2020. China's Character in Peacekeeping in Africa: A Security and Strategic Concerns. Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, V, 12-20.
-
MHRA : Khan, Assad Mehmood, Nazim Rahim, and Mian Muhammad Muzaffar. 2020. "China's Character in Peacekeeping in Africa: A Security and Strategic Concerns." Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, V: 12-20
-
MLA : Khan, Assad Mehmood, Nazim Rahim, and Mian Muhammad Muzaffar. "China's Character in Peacekeeping in Africa: A Security and Strategic Concerns." Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, V.II (2020): 12-20 Print.
-
OXFORD : Khan, Assad Mehmood, Rahim, Nazim, and Muzaffar, Mian Muhammad (2020), "China's Character in Peacekeeping in Africa: A Security and Strategic Concerns", Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, V (II), 12-20
-
TURABIAN : Khan, Assad Mehmood, Nazim Rahim, and Mian Muhammad Muzaffar. "China's Character in Peacekeeping in Africa: A Security and Strategic Concerns." Global Strategic & Security Studies Review V, no. II (2020): 12-20. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsssr.2020(V-II).02